Upaya Penyelesaian Persekusi di Indonesia Menggunakan Pendekatan Analisis Hirarki

La Sugi(1), Mohammad Sarfan Basyir Putuhena(2),


(1) Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ambon
(2) Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ambon

Abstract


This article aims to analyze efforts to solve the problem of persecution that often occurs in Indonesia. Persecution is a type of crime against humanity due to the deliberate deprivation of basic rights that is against the law. This article uses a qualitative approach with an Analytical Hierarchy Process from William Dunn (2003) as the unit of analysis. The results of the study indicate that the Possible Causes or causes that cause a problem are due to law (legal culture) and democracy. While the Plausible Causes or reasonable causes that can have a significant influence on the two causes are disobedience to law, universal truth claims, and majority domination. So that Actionable Causes or what needs to be followed up by the government in overcoming the problem of persecution is optimizing legal education and the state is obliged to provide protection for citizens.

Keywords


Persecution; Legal Culture; Democracy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anand, Z. (2013). Implikasi Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Terhadap Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.25041/FIATJUSTISIA.V7NO3.386

Arifianto, A. R. (2017). Practicing What It Preaches? Understanding the Contradictions between Pluralist Theology and Religious Intolerance within Indonesia’s Nahdlatul Ulama. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 55(2), 241–264. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2017.552.241-264

Asrun, A. M. (2016). Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Kerangka Negara Hukum: Catatan Perjuangan di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 4(1), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.15408/JCH.V4I1.3200

Aswandi, B., & Roisah, K. (2019). Negara Hukum Dan Demokrasi Pancasila Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM). Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(1), 128–145. https://doi.org/10.14710/JPHI.V1I1.128-145

Bernstein, A. R. (2022). John Rawls: The Path to A Theory of Justice by Andrius Gališanka. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 60(1), 171–173. https://doi.org/10.1353/HPH.2022.0008

Campbell, D. E. (2020). The perils of politicized religion. Daedalus, 149(3), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_A_01805

Casram. (2016). Membangun Sikap Toleransi Beragama dalam Masyarakat Plural. Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama Dan Sosial Budaya, 1(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.15575/JW.V1I2.588

Čehulić, M. (2021). Perspectives of legal culture: A systematic literature review. Revija Za Sociologiju, 51(2), 257283. https://doi.org/10.5613/RZS.51.2.4

Cheng, W. (2019). The Rule of Law and the Threat of Civil Disobedience in Hong Kong: Metaphorical Structures in Local Media Coverage. Linguistics Journal, 13(1), 173–196. https://e-resources.perpusnas.go.id:2078/eds/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=6e6e2f7d-c7d7-49eb-9180-594c9d7f97af%40redis&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3d#AN=138874600&db=ufh

Cheung, S. (2019). The Boundaries of Religious Persecution: Refugee Law and the Limits of Permissible Restrictions on Religion. حقوق بشر, 13(2), 141–174. https://doi.org/10.22096/HR.2019.105282.1102

Demidova, I. A. (2021). Legality and Legal Order as Social Criteria of Legal Culture of Society: Theoretical Aspect. Siberian Law Review, 18(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2021-18-1-6-16

Drelichman, M., Vidal-Robert, J., & Voth, H. J. (2021). The long-run effects of religious persecution: Evidence from the Spanish Inquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(33). https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.2022881118/-/DCSUPPLEMENTAL

Dunn, W. N. (2003). Penghantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Gadjah Mada Press.

Effendi, O., & Alfauzi, R. (2021). Dynamics of Application of Salus Populi Suprema Lex Esto in Law Enforcement in Indonesia. UNTAG Law Review, 5(2), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.36356/ULREV.V5I2.2633

Faiz, P. Mohamad. (2020, November). Memaknai Salus Populi Suprema Lex. Majalah Konstitusi, 68–69. https://panmohamadfaiz.com/2020/09/03/memaknai-salus-populi-suprema-lex/

Giroux, H. A. (2021). Education, Politics, and the Crisis of Democracy in the Age of Pandemics. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.14434/JOSOTL.V21I4.33792

Hikmawan, D. M. (2017). Pluralisme Demokrasi Politik di Indonesia. Journal of Governance, 2(2), 223. https://doi.org/10.31506/JOG.V2I2.2678

Hilary Martin, J. (2002). Religious Persecution: And What To Do About It. Dialog, 41(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6385.00108

Iovan, M. (2018). Current Meanings of the Legal Culture Concept and the Question of Truth Regarding its Elements. Academicus International Scientific Journal, 19, 49–64. https://doi.org/10.7336/ACADEMICUS.2019.19.04

Jamil, A. (2021). Resolusi Konflik Struktural Dan Kultural: Studi Kasus Perusakan Rumah Ibadah Ahmadiyah Di Sintang Kalbar. Harmoni, 20(2), 188–208. https://doi.org/10.32488/harmoni.v20i2.506

Keen, D. (2021). Does democracy protect? The United Kingdom, the United States, and Covid-19. Disasters, 45(S1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12527

Kumar, D. (2021). The Difference between Legal Culture, Judicial Culture, and Court Culture. Psychology and Law, 11(4), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.17759/PSYLAW.2021110412

Livingston, A. (2019). Against Civil Disobedience: On Candice Delmas’ A Duty to Resist: When Disobedience Should be Uncivil (New York: Oxford University Press, 2018). Springer.

Lukito, R., Qomaruzzaman, B., Nur Ichwan, M., Efendi, D., Indra Kurniawan, N., Santoso, P., & Wain, A. (2021). Kebangkitan Konservatisme Islam: Politik Identitas dan Potret Demokrasi di Indonesia. Studia Islamika, 28(2), 457–471. https://doi.org/10.36712/SDI.V28I2.22204

Mantovan, C. (2021). Public administration, legal culture, and empirical research: Residential policies for the Sinti in Venice. Romani Studies, 31(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.3828/RS.2021.6

Misrawi, Z. (2013). Kesadaran Multikultural dan Deradikalisasi Pendidikan Islam: Pengalaman Bhinneka Tunggal Ika dan Qabul Al-Akhar. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 2(1), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.14421/JPI.2013.21.197-215

Muabezi, Z. A. (2017). Negara Berdasarkan Hukum (Rechtsstaats) Bukan Kekuasaan (Machtsstaat). Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 6(3), 421–446. https://doi.org/10.25216/JHP.6.3.2017.421-446

Muhaemin, E., Sanusi, I., Sunan, U., & Djati Bandung, G. (2019). Intoleransi Keagamaan dalam Framing Surat Kabar Kompas. Communicatus: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 3(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.15575/CJIK.V3I1.5034

Muhtarom, M. (2015). Pengaruh Budaya Hukum Terhadap Kepatuhan Hukum Dalam Masyarakat. Suhuf, 27(2), 121–144. https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/suhuf/article/view/1428

Musalo, K. (2004). Claims for protection based on religion or belief. International Journal of Refugee Law, 16(2), 165–226. https://doi.org/10.1093/IJRL/16.2.165

Nugroho, D. R., & Suteki, S. (2020). Membangun Budaya Hukum Persidangan Virtual (Studi Perkembangan Sidang Tindak Pidana via Telekonferensi). Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 2(3), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.14710/JPHI.V2I3.291-304

Peterson, B. A. (2019). A Case for Teaching Civil Disobedience in Preparing Students to be Effective Activists. A Response to Justice Citizens, Active Citizenship, and Critical Pedagogy: Reinvigorating Citizenship Education. Democracy and Education, 27(1). https://e-resources.perpusnas.go.id:2078/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=2&sid=6506aa86-4b45-4f89-a436-0d0abebbc716%40redis

Pevnick, R. (2020). The Failure of Instrumental Arguments for a Human Right to Democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 28(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOPP.12197

Putro, A. Y., Hamdan Tri Atmaja, & Ibnu Sodiq. (2017). Konflik Rasial Antara Etnis Tionghoa Dengan Pribumi Jawa di Surakarta Tahun 1972-1998 | Journal of Indonesian History. Journal of Indonesian Histori, 6(1), 66–74. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jih/article/view/20031

Rahardjo, S. (2005). Pendidikan Hukum Sebagai Pendidikan Manusia. LAW REFORM, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.14710/LR.V1I1.12176

Rawls, J. (1991). Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical. Equality and Liberty, 145–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21763-2_10

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. (1998). Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. http://treaties.un.org.

Saputra, Y. (2018). Main Hakim Sendiri Sebagai Bentuk Ketidakpercayaan Masyarakat Terhadap (Penegakan) Hukum. https://vivajusticia.law.ugm.ac.id/2018/01/13/main-hakim-sendiri-sebagai-bentuk-ketidakpercayaan-masyarakat-terhadap-penegakan-hukum/

Schmitter, C. Philipe. T. L. K. (1991). What Democracy Is…and Is Not. Journal of Democracy, 2(3), 75–88. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/what-democracy-is-and-is-not/

Setara Institute. (2019). Mapping Out The Problem of Disturbance Against Christian Churches Toward Its Permanent Resolution in Indonesia | Setara Institute. https://setara-institute.org/en/english-mapping-out-the-problem-of-disturbance-against-christian-churches-toward-its-permanent-resolution-in-indonesia/

Simamora, J. (2014). Tafsir Makna Negara Hukum Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 14(3), 547–561. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.JDH.2014.14.3.318

Wenar, L. (2021). John Rawls. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Zambelli, P. (2020). Knowing Persecution When We See It: Non-State Actors and the Measure of State Protection. International Journal of Refugee Law, 32(1), 28–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/IJRL/EEAA001




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v5i1.1181

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Publisher: Mahesa Research Center

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License