Analisis Wacana “Sinicization of Islam” Pemerintah China Terhadap Muslim Uyghur: Kritik Barat dan Pandangan Islam

Salma Regina(1), Ali Maksum(2),


(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Abstract


This study aims to examine the discourse on policies implemented by Xi Jinping regarding the concept of “Sinicization of Islam” as well as Western criticism and Islamic perspectives. In recent years, the Chinese government under Xi Jinping has issued various policies to integrate religious practices with socialist values and Chinese culture. This has raised concerns about human rights violations and religious freedom for the Uyghur Muslim community. The type of research used is qualitative, while the data processing method used is descriptive discourse analysis by examining relevant documents. Data was obtained through secondary data collection techniques, including literature analysis and media reports. This study found that the discourse of Sinicization of Islam promoted by the Chinese government has been criticized by Western countries and is contrary to the principle of religious freedom in the Islamic perspective. The conclusion of this study emphasizes that the Sinicization policy can be understood as a form of cultural and political domination that causes tension between state ideology and universal values of humanity and Islam.

Keywords


Discourse Analysis; Sinicization of Islam; Western Criticism; Uyghur Muslims; Islamic Perspectives

Full Text:

PDF

References


Basri, H. (2014). Using qualitative research in accounting and management studies: Not a new agenda. Journal of US-China Public Administration, 11(10), 831–838. https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-6591/2014.10.003

Cheng, F. (2021). The evolution of “sinicisation.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 31(2), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1356186320000681

China responsible for “serious human rights violations” in Xinjiang province: UN human rights report. (n.d.). United Nations in Denmark. Retrieved November 13, 2025, from https://un.dk/china-responsible-for-serious-human-rights-violations-in-xinjiang-province-un-human-rights-report/

Dijk, T. A. van. (2015). Principles of critical discourse analysis. https://discourses.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Teun-A.-van-Dijk-2015-Critical-discourse-Analysis.pdf

Dwyer, A. M. (n.d.). The Xinjiang conflict: Uyghur identity, language policy, and political discourse. Retrieved November 13, 2025.

Gallelli, B. (2022). China’s official narratives on Xinjiang: Interethnic mingling, economic prosperity and religious terrorism. Asia Maior, 16(Special Issue 2). https://www.asiamaior.org/the-journal/16-asia-maior-special-issue-2-2022/chinas-official-narratives-on-xinjiang-interethnic-mingling-economic-prosperity-and-religious-terrorism.html

Gilreath, G. S. (2008). Government and religion in China. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/1184

Kam, S., & Clarke, M. (2021). Securitization, surveillance and “de-extremization” in Xinjiang. International Affairs, 97(3), 625–642. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab038

Katzenstein, P. J., & Hau, C. S. (2012). Sinicization and the rise of China: Civilizational processes beyond East and West. Routledge.

Kuan, H.-C. (2012). Religion and politics in China. Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences. https://www.pass.va/content/dam/scienzesociali/pdf/acta17/acta17-kuan.pdf

Liwan, W. (2020). Transition and institutionalization. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 6(4), 371–478. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2377740020500219

Miao, Y. (2020). Romanticising the past: Core socialist values and the China dream as legitimisation strategy. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 49(2), 162–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1868102620981963

Sehrawat, A. (2024). The new regulations for religions in Xinjiang: Part of a wider campaign against religion. Bitter Winter. https://bitterwinter.org/the-new-regulations-for-religions-in-xinjiang-part-of-a-wider-campaign-against-religion/

Stone, H., & Sidel, J. L. (2003). Sensory evaluation: Descriptive analysis. In Encyclopedia of food sciences and nutrition (pp. 5152–5161). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-227055-X/01065-8

Theaker, H. (2024). China’s sinicisation campaign puts Islamic expression on the line. European Asia Briefing Centre. https://doi.org/10.59425/EABC.1715637600

Tibet Rights Collective. (n.d.). China’s sinicization programme erasing the country’s fragile cultural diversity. Retrieved November 13, 2025, from https://www.tibetrightscollective.in/op-eds-commentaries/chinas-sinicization-programme-erasing-the-countrys-fragile-cultural-diversity




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v8i3.2933

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Publisher: Mahesa Research Center

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License