Social Media as the Fifth Estate of Conflict Resolution in Indonesia: A Netnography Study on Digital Activism #PeringatanDarurat

Inadia Aristyavani(1), Edi Nurwahyu Julianto(2), Ade Taryana(3), Miftahol Anwar(4), Jamalullail Jamalullail(5),


(1) Universitas Sahid
(2) Universitas Sahid
(3) Universitas Sahid
(4) Universitas Sahid
(5) Universitas Sahid

Abstract


The Research discusses how digital media can be used as a fifth estate. The fifth pillar refers to the function of social media as a supervisor of public policies or issues. This supervision is through netizens' activities to encourage policymakers to act appropriately. Digital media platforms provide a new space for individuals and groups to share information, self-organize, and influence public policy. This form of supervision is through expressions of disappointment and anger over several social and political situations. The Research uses digital media theory as the fifth pillar of William Dutton. The case studied is the #PeringatanDarurat movement. This case is critical because it relates to a violation of the Constitution. The case began with the government's and the DPR's plan to make an Election Bill contrary to the Constitutional Court's (MK) decision. The Research uses the ethnography method. The data analyzed was Twitter (X) social media user posts. Data collection is carried out through 2 forms: immersion and investigation. Immersion was carried out by observing social and medical user X. The investigation collected posts about #PeringatanDarurat. The data was processed using thematic analysis. The study results show four main themes of social media user posts. First, the manipulation of rules and the Constitution. Second, anger against oligarchs. Social media users expressed outrage at the power that no longer represented the people. Third, social media users call for teenagers to be politically literate. Fourth, a collective invitation to take action together. This Research shows the role of social media as the fifth pillar (the fifth estate). Social media has become the primary means of spreading political awareness and social mobilization.


Keywords


Social media; Fifth Estate; Digital Activism; #PeringatanDarurat; Netnography

Full Text:

PDF

References


Apriyani, T. (2021). Peran Sosial Media pada Gerakan Protes Massa Aksi dan Demokrasi Baru di Era Digital. Kalijaga Journal of Communication, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2021: 17-30, DOI: Https://Doi.Org/10.14421/Kjc.31-02.2021.

Dametto, C., & Bonet-Marti, J. (2024). Netnography of Women´s Cyberactivism Against Environmental Denialism on Instagram. Profesional De La Información, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2024.0011

Drone Emprit. (2024). Kawal Putusan MK: Suara Publik Menyatu dalam Peringatan Darurat. Https://Pers.Droneemprit.Id/Kawal-Putusan-Mk-Suara-Publik-Menyatu-Dalam-Peringatan-Darurat/.

Dutton, W. H. (2009). The Fifth Estate Emerging through the Network of Networks. Prometheus (United Kingdom), 27(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/08109020802657453

Dutton, W. H. (2015). The Internet’s Gift to Democratic Governance: The Fifth Estate. In Can the Media Serve Democracy? Essays in Honour of Jay G. Blumler (pp. 164–173). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137467928_15

Dutton, W. H. (2023). The Fifth Estate: The Power Shift of the Digital Age. Oxford University Press.

Dutton, W. H., & Dubois, E. (2015). The Fifth Estate: A Rising Force of Pluralistic Accountability. In S. Coleman & D. Freelon (Eds.), Handbook of Digital Politics. Edward Elgar.

Ellison, N. B., & Vitak, J. (2015). Social network site affordances and their relationship to social capital processes. In S. S. Sundar (Ed.), The Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology (pp. 205–228). John Wiley & Sons.

Kozinets, R. V. (2020). Netnography: The essential guide to qualitative social media research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Kozinets, R. V, & Gretzel, U. (2023). Qualitative social media methods: netnography in the age of technocultures. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, M. D. Giardina, & G. S. Cannella (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 403–419). Sage Publications.

Littlejohn, S. W., Foss, K. A., & Oetzel, J. G. (2021). Theories of human communication (12th ed.). Waveland Press.

Liu, B., & Zhang, L. (2012). A survey of opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Mining Text Data, 1, 415-463.

Merdeka.com. (2024). Awal Mula dan Makna Gambar “Peringatan Darurat” yang Menggema di Medsos. Https://Www.Merdeka.Com/Politik/Awal-Mula-Dan-Makna-Gambar-Peringatan-Darurat-Yang-Menggema-Di-Medsos-184366-Mvk.Html?Page=3.

Prasetyo, A. G. (2012). Menuju Demokrasi Rasional: Melacak Pemikiran Jürgen Habermas tentang Ruang Publik. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 16(2), 95–186.

Sari, Y. N., & Arianto, I. D. (2023). Aktivisme Tagar #savenoviawidyasari di Twitter. Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 16 (2), 95–186.

Scherman, A., & Rivera, S. (2021). Social Media Use and Pathways to Protest Participation: Evidence From the 2019 Chilean Social Outburst. SocialMedia + Society, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211059704

Smith, M. A. (2014). Mapping Online Social Media Networks. Dalam Reda Alhajj & Jon Rokne (eds), Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. Springer.

Valenzuela, S., Correa, T., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2018). Ties, likes, and tweets: Using strong and weak ties to explain differences in protest participation across Facebook and Twitter use. Political Communication, 35(1), 117–134.

Wang, R., & Zhou, A. (2021). Hashtag Activism and Connective Action: A Case Study of #HongKongPoliceBrutality. Telematics and Informatics, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101600

Yang, G. (2016). Narrative Agency in Hashtag Activism: The Case of #BlackLivesMatter. Media and Communication, 4(4), 13–17.

Yang, X., & Meng, X. (2020). Visual Processing Matters in Chinese Reading Acquisition and Early Mathematics. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00462

Yoon, S., Jeong, S., Jung, E., Kim, K. S., Jeon, I., Lee, Y., Cho, J. Y., Oh, W. Y., & Chung, J. Y. (2021). Effect of CYP3A4 metabolism on sex differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zolpidem. Scientific Reports, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98689-z




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v7i3.2509

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Publisher: Mahesa Research Center

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License